Compliance evidence, generated as you build.
Turns the explainability and monitoring data Nabla-X products already produce into continuous, regulator-ready documentation — model risk registers, bias audits, EU AI Act and ISO 42001-mapped reports — instead of a once-a-year scramble.
Builds compliance documentation as monitoring data accumulates, not once a year under deadline pressure.
Maps internal telemetry directly to EU AI Act and ISO 42001 clause structures, not a generic report.
Surfaces exactly which requirement lacks supporting evidence, rather than a pass/fail summary.
Planned design — the ledger accumulating into a final compliance package. This pipeline does not exist yet.
Pulls model risk signals from Decision Intelligence and anomaly events from Data Reliability as they're produced.
Matches accumulated evidence against EU AI Act, ISO 42001, and other applicable frameworks' clauses.
Produces the documentation a compliance team would otherwise assemble by hand under deadline pressure.
How raw signal becomes one sealed ledger entry — the reasoning approach this concept is designed around, not a working pipeline.
Explainability record for "credit-scoring-v4" — not yet real.
Anomaly / monitoring signal for the same model — not yet real.
No line in a generated report without a traceable source — every entry keeps its links back to the events it was built from.
Every claim traces back to a specific monitoring event or explainability record. No claim without a source.
No separate detection logic — strictly a translation layer on top of Decision Intelligence and Data Reliability.
Maps to the actual clause structure of EU AI Act, ISO 42001, and similar frameworks, not a paraphrase.
The most useful output may be what's missing — explicit gap flagging, not just green checkmarks.
Nothing below is built. This describes the intended design and its dependencies.
Documentation builds as the year goes, not scrambled together before an audit.
Cannot produce anything meaningful until Decision Intelligence and/or Data Reliability are real.
EU AI Act and ISO 42001 specifically, not a vague ‘compliance’ claim.